The Marxist roots of Prof Andrew Jakubowicz Promotion of MultiCulturalism and the denigration of white/anglo Identity in Australia

Professor Andew Jakubowicz is  an  Academic working at the UTS Sydney in the field of Sociology and is an almost 'rabid' promoter of "Multiculturalism" and appears to be an opponent of any sense of traditional Australian identity.

The fact that he is "Jewish" is pertinent to this discussion, because MultiCulturalism has the effect of  "soft, slow motion genocide" of the identity of the founding ethno/cultural characteristics of Australia, and seems to be in line with the writings of another Jewish Academic Noel Ignatiev(see below). There seems to be  a degree of correlation between academic attempts to dilute the sense of identity which shaped the foundation of this country, and either/or Marxism and Jewish identity.

Jackubowicz has a particularly offensive and destructive method of describing the founding of modern Australia, using inflammatory and extremist  terminology which is grossly repulsive to white Australians of British/English ancestry.

 Great Britain and Australia have long historic links, sharing many cultural orientations, the one of course the founder through invasion of the other. says Jacobowicz


Professor Jakubowicz has now been notified of impending legal action under RDA 18C (below) unless he alters the terminology to less offensive words.

Irrespective of the degree of truth in this statement, it is still a matter of perspective, and to quote a lawyer for the Islamic Council of Victoria from the 'Catch the Fire Ministries' case


Ms Mortimer replied: “The tribunal has found there is something wrong with saying it. Truth is not a defence, it’s irrelevant to contravention of the act.”
Well.. for my part, if progressives believe that TRUTH is no defense.. let's run with that right back at them.

If this is the case (had it been accepted by the court) then Professor Jakubowicz might suddenly find himself on the wrong side of a court room under the Race Discrimination Act. He still may because the CTF case was prosecuted under the RRT2001 not the RDA.

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C

Offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin

             (1)  It is unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:

                     (a)  the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and

                     (b)  the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person or of some or all of the people in the group.

I suggest that given Professor Jakubowicz attack on white Australians as 'invaders'constituted by his article(2), is, under the law, VERY offensive, and is made on the grounds of the national origin and skin color of white Australians.

So, any would be lawyers out there, why not consider bringing an action against him ? The damages you can seek should be commensurate with the degree of offense and insult you experience..

Do you feel 'powerless' ?  Do you think "aah.. I can't make a difference"?  YOU CAN..and here's how.
a) If you can make a case for racial vilification, just goto the VHREOC website and click on 'online complaints'
b) Fill in the blanks and click "lodge".. that simple.

They take real complaints seriously, and will investigate them all. If they decline to conciliate, you can still within 60 days request the case be taken to VCAT. If that happens, the other side HAS to prepare a defense, which means costly lawyers.. and even if you don't turn up.... and the complaint is struck out.... it still cost them a lot! Now..if 20 people made separate complaints about the same thing ?  aaah.. go figure the cost to the other side.
 
But I must not digress, back to the core point of this post- Reference to Prof Jakubowicz being Jewish  is not for a moment to suggest that being Jewish automatically means that an individual is going  be Marxist or to deliberately  undermine traditional Australian identity, it is simply to observe a degree of correlation in Academia and political activism of this phenomenon.  It is an 'opinion' and observation. If any reader sees in this an attempt to denigrate Jewish people as a whole, they would be drawing inferences which are by no means intended.

The correlation between Jewish ethnicity and Marxism is especially noticable in the Frankfurt school of social theorists where most of them were both Jewish and Marxist. though, in their political thinking, they tried to divorce themselves from their Jewishness. The impact of such academics is still being felt today in such things as:
-Political Correctness,
-MultiCulturalism,  (Jakubowicz)
-Sexual 'liberation', (too many to name)
-Feminism, (can you count them?)
-Animal Rights, (Laurie Levy)
-Environmentalism etc. (Bob Brown/Green extremists)

One needs to examine the theories of the likes of  Herbert Marcuse and his essay "Repressive Tolerance" to catch a glimpse of this. From the Frankfurt school, Jurgen Habermas seems to be the exception in that he was from a protestant background rather than Jewish.

The direction of this group of social theorists was shaped by:

 the failure of the working-class revolution in Western Europe (precisely where Marx had predicted that a communist revolution would take place) and by the rise of Nazism in such an economically and technologically advanced nation as Germany. This led many of them to take up the task of choosing what parts of Marx's thought might serve to clarify contemporary social conditions which Marx himself had never seen.(1)


 So it is no bad reflection on the Jewish people as a whole to make such an observation.
Jakubowicz' perpetual 'mantra' is that we must celebrate diversity and embrace 'multi-culturalism'.
The reader will notice a definite trend in the graph in Jacobowicz article showing the reduction of adherence to traditional religions of Australians and a growth of non religion or increases in 'other' religions. See for example "Islam" from 1996 to 2001 where there is an increase of over 40% and Buddhism of 79%

	1996		%		2001		%		Change %
Christianity			70.9				68.0		-1.1
Anglican	3,903.3		22.0		3,881.2		20.7		-0.6
Baptist	295.2		1.7		309.2		1.6		4.8
Catholic	4,799.0		27.0		5,001.6		26.6		4.2
Churches of Christ	75.0		0.4		61.3		0.3		-18.2
Jehovah’s Witness	83.4		0.5		81.1		0.4		-2.8
Lutheran	250.0		1.4		250.4		1.3		0.2
Orthodox	497.0		2.8		529.4		2.8		6.5
Pentecostal	174.7		1.0		194.6		1.0		11.4
Presbyterian and      Reformed	675.5		3.8		637.5		3.4		-5.6
Salvation Army	74.1		0.4		71.4		0.4		-3.7
Uniting Church	1,334.9		7.5		1,248.7		6.7		-6.5
Other Christian	420.6		2.4		497.9		2.7		18.4
Buddhism	199.8		1.1		357.8		1.9		79.1
Hinduism	67.3		0.4		95.5		0.5		41.9
Islam	200.9		1.1		281.6		1.5		40.2
Judaism	79.8		0.4		84.0		0.4		5.2
Other religions	68.6		0.4		92.4		0.5		34.6
No religion	2,948.9		16.6		2,906.0		15.5		-1.5
Not stated/inadequately described	1,604.7		9.0		2,187.7		11.7		36.3
Total	17,752.8		100.0		18,769.2		100.0		5.7

The most critical question we must face is... "Are these changes simply 'happening' or, are they driven by deliberate actions of people with a strong sense of political/social agenda?"

In short, Anglo's don't have any more presense or position or history in Australia than the most recently arrived Sri Lankan Tamil or afghan country shopper. History is not quite like that. Australia was founded by the British, and created as a nation by a British act of Parliament.
Royal Assent was given by Queen Victoria on 9 July 1900, upon which date the Constitution became law. It came into force on 1 January 1901.

He may as well just come out with his true agenda. (2)

Could his true agenda be as radical as that of his ethno religious/political fellow academic Noel Ignatiev, former Harvard history professor who said it outright ABOLISH THE WHITE RACE ? (3)

...but let's use the full title of Ignatiev's radical racist essay, as it's remeniscent of the pre holocaust chatter in Germany "Abolish the White Race... BY ANY MEANS neccessary"... I kid you not.  That sounds eerily like *final solution*. Just read the link below to see it in black and white.  It's amazing that just yesterday, at the Federal court trial of Andew Bolt for alledged  'insulting' language in his articles, the Lawyer for the complainants,  former federal court Judge (Ron Merkel QC-also Jewish)  made reference to 'nipping in the bud' language which was like that which led up to the holocaust. Yet here we find Jakubowicz and Ignatiev, both Jewish, producing 'chatter' which could easily be seen as of a similar tone to that of pre holocaust Germany, but this time it's against 'whites' simply because of their skin color. Talk about Irony. Note, the fact of these activists and legal people being "Jewish" is pertinent to this discussion. It should NOT be understood as an attack on 'all' Jewish people in any way. It relates to individuals.

To understand Jakubowicz, one needs, in my opinion,  to look at the Frankfurt school of Social thinkers, to Herbert Marcuse, to the Columbia based "Institute for Social Research" (founded by the Frankfurt school theorists after they fled Germany with the rise of the Nazi's), and how all that relates to and connects with the 'progressive' socio/political agenda. (Just google any of those terms)

That Agenda appears to include:
-Dilute any sense of racial component in national identity to the point where a previously majority group, by which the fundamental social fabric of a nation has been woven, to the point of the population being just a 'diverse' mixture of 'groups' which are then easier to apply 'divide and rule' methods to.
-Emphasize and promote "Diversity" as part of the above.
-Promote 'international obligations' and the UN as the supreme source of Global Governance.
-Undermine the moral fabric of the nations conservative values with notions of 'liberation' like the 60s with the Hippie,Yippie,Students for a Democratic society (marxist) and various other 'progressive' elements.
-Use such things as pornography and permissiveness to acheive 'sexual liberation and equality' so called.
For a specific example of this, please see the following academic article:
http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38
Note specially the content under heading 'sexual revolutionaries'.(4)

Even now, there is an "Institute for Social Research" in Victoria at Swinburne University. The name seems to us to be 'docile' and 'innocent'.. somewhat like a wolf in sheeps clothing... such as is the coat of arms of the Fabian socialists.
It's worth knowing too, that the following are members of the Australian Fabian society.
Gough Whitlam
Paul keating
Bob Hawke
Julia Gillard
Knowing this, you can better understand the meaning of the political postures they adopt.



1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School
2. http://andrewjakubowicz.com/publications/anglo-multiculturalism-contradictions-in-the-politics-of-cultural-diversity-as-risk/
3. http://racetraitor.org/abolish.html
4. http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38